Carv's Thinky Blog I'm an author with a focus on satirical science fiction.

21Apr/100

Rereading the Good Book, Part 2

Before I went to sleep on April 6, I posted this charming verse:

"'If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, he shall pay the girl's father fifty shekels of silver. He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives.'--Deuteronomy 22:28-29"

Tough but fair. According to the New Jerusalem Bible, a shekel of silver was a unit of weight equal to about .39 ounces. Fifty of those would be 19.5 ounces. As of April 7, silver was worth $18.19 an ounce, so fifty shekels (19.5 ounces) would be worth $354.71. "Good," Donna replied. "That's what he gets. I hope she turned into a harridan."

"What's your game?" Kevin asked, a question I dodged by answering, "Scrabble!" I did that for two reasons. First, I knew this blog series was coming, so I'd answer it then. Second, I didn't know the answer yet. Yes, I'm contrarian. That was part of it. It took me until yesterday to realize what I was up to, so I'll save that to build narrative tension. I'm a writer-type person!

April 7: "['Then the LORD said to Moses...'] 'If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property.'--Exodus 21:20-21"

The "LORD said" bit is from the chapter before, just for context. Incidentally, the verse from Exodus 21 is from the same divine lecture in which "the LORD" (an NIV substitute for "YHWH," the personal name of the Hebrew God) gave us the Ten Commandments. These slave-beating restrictions, then, have equal weight with Thou Shalt Not Kill. Let's set aside the issue of whether God should condone slavery. I think we all agree He dropped the ball on that one. But beating your male or female slave within an inch of his or her life, then getting off scot-free because he or she rallies a day later, well...that just seems...okay, I'm gonna say it, so...stay with me here...immoral. The Bible, at least the parts God dictated in Exodus, are not always moral. There, I said it. I'll fall on the sword. I'm the bad guy.

"But what if he beats his male or female slave with something else," Colin asked, "like pillows?"

As he is wont to do, Eric posed a reasonable, intelligent, compassionate rebuttal. I hope he won't mind if I quote it extensively here:

"If it's not fair for someone to cherry pick only the verses that they like to defend the bible and/or Christianity, why is it fair for someone to cherry pick only the verses they don't like to tear it down?...I, as a Christian, am told by atheists that what I believe is 'myth and fantasy,' outdated, irrelevant...and even downright stupid and wrong. I'm told that if I believe these things that I'm a hate-monger, racist, elitist, misogynistic, unforgiving, etc., etc. Are YOU telling me these things? I don't think so...and I hope that I don't paint all atheists/agnostics with that type of broad brush."

These comments followed my contention that "we irreligious folks are told 'ALL Scripture [not just the New Testament] is God-breathed [given by inspiration of God] and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness,' AND that the Bible is the moral foundation of American law and government, AND that Bibilical morality is so righteous that atheists, who do not share it, cannot be trusted to run a civilization. I'm actually not arguing for the overthrow of religion. I'm just saying that if we're going to disregard Bible verses none of us like (which is fine, by the way), then maybe we could also disregard the verses in which, say, God calls for the death of all gay people and nonbelievers." This hints at my ultimate purpose, so I'll let Eric have the last word for today:

"I would argue 'ALL Scripture IS God-breathed (given by inspiration of God) and IS useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness,' AND that the Bible and its teachings ARE what our country was founded on and the main source of its morality. Does that make our country, those who founded it, and/or the Bible perfect? No. The Bible was inspired by God, yes, but written by and translated (many many times in many many languages) by men. Flawed, human, imperfect, prone to their own agenda...men....

"The REAL point of Christianity isn't being sinless...it's about accepting Gods grace. It's about knowing and accepting that, in fact, you WILL sin, and that if you honestly are repentant for it, you will ALWAYS be forgiven.

"It's too bad that too many Christians and atheists alike can't see that."

...To be continued-er!

Print This Post Print This Post
Comments (0) Trackbacks (0)
  1. Saying the Earth was created in 6 literal days is not a “translation error.” Saying that a world-wide flood killed all life on the planet except for the people and animals in some guy’s boat isn’t a translation error, either. It’s just wrong. So the men who wrote the book just, what, didn’t hear God correctly? It’s amazing the hoops that people will jump through to hang onto their irrational beliefs. But as I’ve said before, people are welcome to these irrational beliefs — as long as they keep them out of the schools and the legislature.

  2. I agree with everything you said, Scott, even the parts that sounded mean–unfortunately, there’s no way to tell someone their beliefs are mythology rather than history without implying the believer is “stupid and wrong.” I’ll say more about this tonight, but of course I don’t consider Eric stupid. I don’t know if he believes Genesis, for example, is literal history, but I tend to imagine not.

    The Witnesses believe each Genesis creation day equals six thousand years. Other Christians assign longer representative lengths. Either way, it dodges the point: the Garden of Eden story NEVER HAPPENED. We do not derive from two naked people in an oasis with magic fruit and a talking snake. If we read that in any other culture’s belief system, we’d pat the believers on their charming little heads.

    As for “the schools and legislature”…well, you’ve sort of anticipated where some of this is headed.

  3. Believing in God and/or Christ doesn’t make one stupid. (Although there are stupid people with all kinds of beliefs.) However, the belief that the Bible is completely inerrant is willfully ignorant. The very concept of a supernatural being that can not only whip up a universe in the blink of an eye BUT ALSO concerns itself with making certain baseball teams win or finding lost girls in swamps is itself a wish-fulfillment fantasy. But childhood indoctrination and human psychology work together to make it very difficult to divest oneself of the delusion. I don’t think the people who can’t get out of it are stupid. My brother-in-law believes in faeries and homeopathy and he’s a reasonably intelligent guy. But I’m not forced to take homeopathic medicine (i.e. water) from him, nor does it say “In Faeries We Trust” on my money. (Whatever happened to the whole “render unto Caesar” thing?) I’m just sick of all the Dominionist b.s. and the right-wing trying to legislate morality for the rest of us. And mostly the “rational” believers in our midst just hit us with some variation of the No True Scotsman fallacy. It’s crazy-making (and obviously, “mean” comment-inducing). Anyway, I’ll be anxious to read the climax of this blog series of yours. (A few anticipatory “rah-rah’s” for you.)

  4. I love it when I learn from my readers! I had no idea what the No True Scotsman fallacy was. If you don’t, either, it’s described simply here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman


Leave a comment

CAPTCHA
Change the CAPTCHA codeSpeak the CAPTCHA code
 

No trackbacks yet.